Shabu: Pharmaceutical-Grade Meth

You know you’re getting good drugs when they are delivered in the figure of a Japanese demon. The Denver Westword talks about “Shabu,” pharmaceutical-grade methampetamine hydrochloride and three-day parties fueled by the stuff. Unlike street meth, which is 10 to 20 percent methamphetamine (and 80 to 90 percent razzle dazzle!), shabu is over 95 percent delicious. Of course, it seems even cooler when it has a neato Japanese name and isn’t just called “pure meth.”

A little vaporized blip from shabu will keep you pepped for 12 hours. It sounds less like a party and more like a programming marathon.

Speed-binge supplies of a different nature have been cached in a master-bathroom medicine cabinet — one bottle holding ninety Valiums and another with forty tablets of ProVigil, the market name for the experimental drug Modafonil, a sleep suppressant the U.S. military tested on fighter and bomber pilots in Afghanistan and Iraq. Modafonil is now prescribed for cancer patients to combat the chronic-fatigue side effects of chemotherapy. Nick has laid in a supply because he claims he’s found that combining Modafonil with Shabu takes the edge off the undesirable psychological whammies of sleep deprivation, including auditory hallucinations and paranoid delusions.

72-Hour Party People [Westword via Kottke]


4 Responses to “Shabu: Pharmaceutical-Grade Meth”

  1. 1 tec

    Fact check alert! Modafonil isn’t experimental. It’s been approved for narcolepsy and hypersomnia for years. It also doesn’t work very well.

    Oh, and pure meth sounds like a terrible idea. Like morons don’t od often enough already.

  2. 2 naptown drew

    Jesus Tapdancing Christ the people in the story sound like they are addicted and yet well-funded. I bet it won’t be long before they start rationalizing tweaked out trips to China because the discount Shabu pays for the airfare.

  3. 3 Alex

    Seriously! And the article mentions *nothing* about where you can score any!

  4. 4 forrest

    Tec-

    That article was published in 2003, so that *may* explain the “experimental” part. Then again, maybe not.

Leave a Reply







Close
E-mail It