Comments on: Rasher Mashers: Bacon Caramel

By: marth

marth — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:36:10 +0000

trying to save face after using piss-poor grammar… quite amusing…

By: Carlos

Carlos — Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:30:05 +0000

In this case, the double negative is perfectly fine, following a couple of singular-negative posts.

Thanks for playing, though!

By: Matt Moore

Matt Moore — Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:24:30 +0000

And this concludes our investigation into why double negatives are grammatically incorrect.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:41:42 +0000

Matt – “doesn’t NOT” is a double negative.

By: Matt Moore

Matt Moore — Mon, 16 Oct 2006 01:11:20 +0000

Carlos is on crack. Pork and sweetness are made for each other. Think bacon waffles with syrup. Or sweet and sour pork. Or ham and pineapple pizza. Or anything hawaiian. Or Kansas City style ribs. The list of sugar + pig goodness goes on and on.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:02:37 +0000

pork + sweetness doesn’t NOT go together!

Think: Busch’s Baked Beans, which always have a chunk of pork in the can yet feature a fairly sweet, syrupy flavor.

By: aron

aron — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:23:53 +0000

Woah. Well I am pretty adventurous with the food, and I do so love bacon, but reading: “A couple slices of white bread and you’ve got a light, on-the-go snack for two, at best” really has me wondering what person could honestly eat a half-casserole dish of that stuff.

Not just the flavor, which seems like it could be overwhelming, but consider your health, by not eating one of those you could probably keep smoking for another 5 years and come out even! ;)

By: Matt

Matt — Sun, 15 Oct 2006 04:35:01 +0000

Um, not quite sure how to say this nicely so I’ll just say it…

It’s hard to imagine something looking LESS appetizing without intentionally looking for roadkill…

just my 2 cents.